<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Midgard &#8211; AIS Theme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/archives/2005/06/07/midgard-ais-theme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/archives/2005/06/07/midgard-ais-theme/</link>
	<description>The life experiences of Adam Douglas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Warden</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/archives/2005/06/07/midgard-ais-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>The Warden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/?p=139#comment-650</guid>
		<description>* Yes it does. This doesn&#039;t mean this would be the only theme (classic). I wasn&#039;t aware that this welcome page was going to continue. I thought it was going to be centralized into one place instead of multiple locations?

* No this wouldn&#039;t be a problem. This is why I mentioned I wanted to get the other page mock up done. You would be presented with this screen shot then taken to the site settings or site authoring/administration page. At this page you would have the entire wide of the browser for the content  area.

* Well I understand that but thought this would change. I disagree that it would continue to be embedded into the user&#039;s web site. This is an interface of it&#039;s own and should be given the entire area for content. It makes it to restrictive and what does it honestly gain by having it embedded?

I&#039;ll make the next mock up and post that and also see about coming up with an entirely new look instead of the classic m-p.org look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Yes it does. This doesn&#8217;t mean this would be the only theme (classic). I wasn&#8217;t aware that this welcome page was going to continue. I thought it was going to be centralized into one place instead of multiple locations?</p>
<p>* No this wouldn&#8217;t be a problem. This is why I mentioned I wanted to get the other page mock up done. You would be presented with this screen shot then taken to the site settings or site authoring/administration page. At this page you would have the entire wide of the browser for the content  area.</p>
<p>* Well I understand that but thought this would change. I disagree that it would continue to be embedded into the user&#8217;s web site. This is an interface of it&#8217;s own and should be given the entire area for content. It makes it to restrictive and what does it honestly gain by having it embedded?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll make the next mock up and post that and also see about coming up with an entirely new look instead of the classic m-p.org look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henri Bergius</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/archives/2005/06/07/midgard-ais-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Henri Bergius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 07:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdesk.com/be/?p=139#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Couple of quick comments:

* This layout is following the current Midgard site design. However, the new visual outlook of the project is closer to the Midgard Welcome Page in 1.6:
https://admin.ftc.fi/midgard/

* Also, I think a problem is that the layout leaves quite little space for the actual content area (the wider box in the screenshot). With complex forms or components, this might not be enough.

* And as a third comment, it should be noted that in current situation the AIS tools are embedded in user&#039;s site layout, so the area given to AIS can be quite small. However, we might choose to show AIS in completely its own layout in the future

But anyway, a good start, definitely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Couple of quick comments:</p>
<p>* This layout is following the current Midgard site design. However, the new visual outlook of the project is closer to the Midgard Welcome Page in 1.6:<br />
<a href="https://admin.ftc.fi/midgard/" rel="nofollow">https://admin.ftc.fi/midgard/</a></p>
<p>* Also, I think a problem is that the layout leaves quite little space for the actual content area (the wider box in the screenshot). With complex forms or components, this might not be enough.</p>
<p>* And as a third comment, it should be noted that in current situation the AIS tools are embedded in user&#8217;s site layout, so the area given to AIS can be quite small. However, we might choose to show AIS in completely its own layout in the future</p>
<p>But anyway, a good start, definitely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.adamsdesk.com/be/archives/2005/06/07/midgard-ais-theme/feed/ ) in 0.47482 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:09 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:09 am UTC -->
